Sylvan Games
 

Articles

 
You are: Home -> Articles -> Feature Article

07-09-2001

Feature Article

Cheating - and the perils of playing Judge, Jury & Executioner

Last weekend I played in the last of the Sydney GP trials for GP Brisbane. As always, Chris Foggin ran a great event.

An issue came up, however, and I feel I must make a post on the topic.

The topic is, of course, "Cheating".

The issue happened in the first round with 2 players (let's say Player B & Player A). The match is locked at 1 game all and Player A thinks that there is something fishy with the way that Player B has shuffled his deck. Player A draws 7 cards, but only 1 land. He mulligans, reshuffles and Player B again shuffles his deck in a dubious manner. Player A draws 6 cards and no land. Player B wins the third game as Player A has to take a sub-optimal hand. Player A broods on the issue and mentions it to me after round 4 and asks me what can be done about the result.

Answer: Nothing.

Player A's error was not calling a judge immediately. Nothing can be done at this point except for starting rumours about Player B, which is probably an even worse result.

Players who do not call judges over for infringements, no matter how small, are not only robbing themselves of a fun day, but they aren't letting the judges do their job. My point is that everyone makes mistakes, I've made heaps myself, but if these infringements aren't tracked then the DCI has a much harder job of finding out who the real cheats are. They have penalty records for all players and can track patterns of infringement over a period of time. If players accidentally draw extra cards, then punish them in accordance with the DCI penalty Guidelines (that's what they're there for). If they do it regularly then it becomes a larger matter.

As for making comments to other players instead of calling a judge, this would have to be worse than cheating itself and should have harsher penalties. On the Pro Tour, most of the players are much more worried about getting the stigma of being known as a "cheat", than the actual penalty itself. Unfounded comments about players cheating can cause a player to be hounded by all others, which is not really fair if the error was a genuine mistake, and I think we've all made a few - I'll list a few of mine:

  • Illegal decklist (Registered a 57-card main deck)
  • Illegal decklist (Registered a 13-card sideboard)
  • Failed to de-sideboard (FNM - I was the judge & TO!) *
  • Failed to de-sideboard (Regionals 2001)*
  • Failed to de-sideboard (Nationals 2000)
  • Illegal deck (5 howling mines!!!)*
  • Marked sleeves (No pattern - bought the sleeves off the head judge that day)*
Does this make me a cheat or does this make me inept?

I called the illegal deck, the marked sleeves and 2 of the 3 sideboarding offences on myself - so most people realise that it's the latter, but these offences are of the same severity as "drawing extra cards", "slow play" & "unsportsmanlike conduct - major". If I ever get into trouble for one of these then I would appreciate some understanding.

I'm sure you would to.

Unfortunately, this often leaves judges in the position of jury & executioner as well. Nobody likes the cop that books you, nobody likes the referee that penalises your team and nobody likes the judge that gives you a game loss for a trivial oversight.

I'd really like to get this point across - what goes on during a match should be left at the card table. On Sunday I played Ben Seck in the last round and called a judge to monitor his sideboarding, as he was taking too long. He was given the appropriate penalty. I called the judges for slow play again later in the round (which, in retrospect, was overkill), but at the end of the day we realised where we were both coming from, and we would never hold our competitive natures against each other. ("No", I don't think Ben would ever cheat and "Yes", he did beat me).

At the same time we can draw other conclusions from this. Everyone wants to win. That's the driving force that makes us competitive - some people just want it too much, and that's the other point I need to make - we play to have fun, if you think it's anything more than that you really have ask yourself some serious questions.

What is the most we will ever get out of the game???
Is that worth our integrity???
Is it worth robbing someone of fair competition???
Is it worth being robbed???

If you answered "fun/enjoyment", "no", "no" and "no" then hopefully you understand why judges do what they do. As for keeping the "real cheats" out of our game, I'll highlight the main points from David Price's Mindripper article:

May 16, 1998
1. ALWAYS shuffle your opponent's deck.
2. Keep track of BOTH players' life totals with PEN and PAPER.
3. Watch when your opponent draws or manipulates the library and occasionally count cards in hand, permanents, and cards in the graveyard to make sure that both you and your opponent have drawn the correct number of cards.

The full article is worth a read and is available at: http://magic.mindripper.com/index.cfm?Site=1&Show=Archive

That's it from me. I'll see you at either the Wollongong GP trial this Saturday or the IBC at Rockdale on Sunday. The full Sydney tournament calender is available at:

"Foggo's house of fun & joy" - http://www.users.bigpond.com/egg/

All the best.
Dan Gow.

manaflares@yahoo.com

[an error occurred while processing this directive]